UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial

Inwald, DP; Canter, R; Woolfall, K; Mouncey, P; Zenasni, Z; O'Hara, C; Carter, A; ... PERUKI (Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland) and; + view all (2018) Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood , 104 pp. 426-431. 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314924. Green open access

[thumbnail of Peters_426.full.pdf]
Preview
Text
Peters_426.full.pdf

Download (448kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of restricted fluid bolus volume (10 mL/kg) versus recommended practice (20 mL/kg). DESIGN: Nine-month pilot RCT with embedded mixed-method perspectives study. SETTING: 13 hospitals in England. PATIENTS: Children presenting to emergency departments with suspected infection and shock after 20 mL/kg fluid. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to further 10 or 20 mL/kg fluid boluses every 15 min for up to 4 hours if still in shock. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These were based on progression criteria, including recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, separation, potential trial outcome measures, and parent and staff perspectives. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants were randomised; two were withdrawn. 23 (59%) of 39 in the 10 mL/kg arm and 25 (74%) of 34 in the 20 mL/kg arm required a single trial bolus before the shock resolved. 79% of boluses were delivered per protocol in the 10 mL/kg arm and 55% in the 20 mL/kg arm. The volume of study bolus fluid after 4 hours was 44% lower in the 10 mL/kg group (mean 14.5 vs 27.5 mL/kg). The Paediatric Index of Mortality-2 score was 2.1 (IQR 1.6-2.7) in the 10 mL/kg group and 2.0 (IQR 1.6-2.5) in the 20 mL/kg group. There were no deaths. Length of hospital stay, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and PICU-free days at 30 days did not differ significantly between the groups. In the perspectives study, the trial was generally supported, although some problems with protocol adherence were described. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were not as unwell as expected. A larger trial is not feasible in its current design in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 15244462.

Type: Article
Title: Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314924
Publisher version: https://adc.bmj.com/content/early/2018/08/07/archd...
Language: English
Additional information: This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10054294
Downloads since deposit
72Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item