The Julius Caesar objection

In Richard G. Heck (ed.), Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett. Oxford University Press. pp. 273--308 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that that Caesar problem had a technical aspect, namely, that it threatened to make it impossible to prove, in the way Frege wanted, that there are infinitely many numbers. It then offers a solution to the problem, one that shows Frege did not really need the claim that "numbers are objects", not if that claim is intended in a form that forces the Caesar problem upon us.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-18

Downloads
2,367 (#3,529)

6 months
236 (#10,501)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Kimberly Heck
Brown University

Citations of this work

Neo-fregeanism and quantifier variance.Theodore Sider - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):201–232.
Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism.Fraser MacBride - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.
Frege and semantics.Richard G. Heck - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):27-63.

View all 36 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Function and Concept.Gottlob Frege - 1960 - In D. H. Mellor & Alex Oliver (eds.), Properties. Oxford University Press. pp. 130-149.

Add more references