We are not able to resolve this OAI Identifier to the repository landing page. If you are the repository manager for this record, please head to the Dashboard and adjust the settings.
Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo AGH
Doi
Abstract
Over the last decade, researchers have investigated to what extent cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) shows advantages over traditional defect prediction settings. These works do not take the training and testing data of defect prediction from the same project; instead, dissimilar projects are employed. Selecting the proper training data plays an important role in terms of the success of CPDP. In this study, a novel clustering method called complexFuzzy is presented for selecting the training data of CPDP. The method reveals the most defective instances that the experimental predictors exploit in order to complete the training. To that end, a fuzzy-based membership is constructed on the data sets. Hence, overfitting (which is a crucial problem in CPDP training) is alleviated. The performance of complexFuzzy is compared to its 5 counterparts on 29 data sets by utilizing 4 classifiers. According to the obtained results, complexFuzzy is superior to other clustering methods in CPDP performance
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.