Repository landing page

We are not able to resolve this OAI Identifier to the repository landing page. If you are the repository manager for this record, please head to the Dashboard and adjust the settings.

Attitudes of Secondary Students Toward Online and Face-to-Face Learning in Mathematics: A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative, causal-comparative study is to investigate the current differences between online and face-to-face student attitudes toward mathematics and computer-based learning at the high school level. Because instruction and technology use have been influenced by the Covid-19 pandemic, it is important to assess student attitudes toward mathematics and computer-based learning in both traditional face-to-face and online settings. This study was conducted with 70 face-to-face students and 67 online high school students in a single school district in North Carolina. The Galbraith-Haines Mathematics-Computer Attitude Scales were used as the data collection instrument measuring student confidence toward mathematics, mathematics motivation, computer confidence, and computer-mathematics interaction. A secure Google form was used for data collection in the spring of 2023. A one-way MANOVA was used to determine if there was a difference in attitudes between the online and face-to-face participants in the dependent variables. The result of the MANOVA was significant, where F(4, 127) = 10.448, p \u3c .001, Pillai’s Trace = .248, and partial η^2 = 0.248, suggesting there are significant differences on the dependent variables by setting type for high school mathematics students in online and face-to-face settings. Results indicated a higher confidence in mathematics held by face-to-face students, higher mathematics motivation held by online students, and higher computer-mathematics interaction held by online students. No significant difference was found between online and face-to-face students in the area of computer confidence. Recommendations for further studies include a larger sample size, a comparison of technology uses, and a qualitative study

Similar works

This paper was published in Liberty University Digital Commons.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.