We are not able to resolve this OAI Identifier to the repository landing page. If you are the repository manager for this record, please head to the Dashboard and adjust the settings.
We consider the planning of railway freight classification at hump yards, where the problem
involves the formation of departing freight train blocks from arriving trains subject to
scheduling and capacity constraints. The hump yard layout considered consists of arrival
tracks of sufficient length at an arrival yard, a hump, classification tracks of non-uniform
and possibly non-sufficient length at a classification yard, and departure tracks of sufficient
length. To increase yard capacity, freight cars arriving early can be stored temporarily
on specific mixed-usage tracks. The entire hump yard planning process is covered in this
paper, and heuristics for arrival and departure track assignment, as well as hump scheduling,
have been included to provide the neccessary input data. However, the central problem
considered is the classification track allocation problem. This problem has previously
been modeled using direct mixed integer programming models, but this approach did not
yield lower bounds of sufficient quality to prove optimality. Later attempts focused on
a column generation approach based on branch-and-price that could solve problem instances
of industrial size. Building upon the column generation approach we introduce
a direct arc-based integer programming model, where the arcs are precedence relations
between blocks on the same classification track. Further, the most promising models
are adapted for rolling-horizon planning. We evaluate the methods on historical data
from the Hallsberg shunting yard in Sweden. The results show that the new arc-based
model performs as well as the column generation approach. It returns an optimal schedule
within the execution time limit for all instances but from one, and executes as fast
as the column generation approach. Further, the short execution times of the column
generation approach and the arc-indexed model make them suitable for rolling-horizon
planning, while the direct mixed integer program proved to be too slow for this.
Extended analysis of the results shows that mixing was only required if the maximum
number of concurrent trains on the classification yard exceeds 29 (there are 32 available
tracks), and that after this point the number of extra car roll-ins increases heavily
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.