Repository landing page

We are not able to resolve this OAI Identifier to the repository landing page. If you are the repository manager for this record, please head to the Dashboard and adjust the settings.

A Study of Pseudo-Periodic and Pseudo-Bordered Words for Functions Beyond Identity and Involution

Abstract

Periodicity, primitivity and borderedness are some of the fundamental notions in combinatorics on words. Motivated by the Watson-Crick complementarity of DNA strands wherein a word (strand) over the DNA alphabet \{A, G, C, T\} and its Watson-Crick complement are informationally ``identical , these notions have been extended to consider pseudo-periodicity and pseudo-borderedness obtained by replacing the ``identity function with ``pseudo-identity functions (antimorphic involution in case of Watson-Crick complementarity). For a given alphabet Σ\Sigma, an antimorphic involution θ\theta is an antimorphism, i.e., θ(uv)=θ(v)θ(u)\theta(uv)=\theta(v) \theta(u) for all u,v∈Σ∗u,v \in \Sigma^{*} and an involution, i.e., θ(θ(u))=u\theta(\theta(u))=u for all u∈Σ∗u \in \Sigma^{*}. In this thesis, we continue the study of pseudo-periodic and pseudo-bordered words for pseudo-identity functions including involutions. To start with, we propose a binary word operation, θ\theta-catenation, that generates θ\theta-powers (pseudo-powers) of a word for any morphic or antimorphic involution θ\theta. We investigate various properties of this operation including closure properties of various classes of languages under it, and its connection with the previously defined notion of θ\theta-primitive words. A non-empty word uu is said to be θ\theta-bordered if there exists a non-empty word vv which is a prefix of uu while θ(v)\theta(v) is a suffix of uu. We investigate the properties of θ\theta-bordered (pseudo-bordered) and θ\theta-unbordered (pseudo-unbordered) words for pseudo-identity functions θ\theta with the property that θ\theta is either a morphism or an antimorphism with θn=I\theta^{n}=I, for a given n≥2n \geq 2, or θ\theta is a literal morphism or an antimorphism. Lastly, we initiate a new line of study by exploring the disjunctivity properties of sets of pseudo-bordered and pseudo-unbordered words and some other related languages for various pseudo-identity functions. In particular, we consider such properties for morphic involutions θ\theta and prove that, for any i≥2i \geq 2, the set of all words with exactly ii θ\theta-borders is disjunctive (under certain conditions)

Similar works

This paper was published in Scholarship@Western.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.